DQ questions and respond in at least 75 words.

Do you need academic writing help with your homework? Let us write your papers.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

DQ questions and respond in at least 75 words.

DQ questions and respond in at least 75 words.
Critical thinking Oftentimes, we are 100% sure something is true (we are convinced of certain conclusions). Write about a time when you felt convinced of something, but it turned out to be false (wrong). Based on the definition of valid and invalid arguments, why should we be careful when we draw conclusions we think we are sure of? Inductive reasoning leads to the philosophical problem of induction, and conclusions you draw every day are inductive. Entertain a possibility of how these conclusions could turn out to be wrong (false). The fact that what has happened in the past cannot always predict what may happen in the future leads to uncertainty and uneasiness. In what sense are we lucky that some things do happen the way they have happened in the past? How you can improve your critical thinking by being mindful of this? All countries have cities. Canada is a country. Therefore, Canada has cities. This is an example of a valid argument. Write your own valid argument. Explain why your argument is valid. In your explanation, make sure you appeal to the idea of truth-preserving arguments. Consider the following argument: All states in the United States have capital cities. Paris, France, is a capital city. Therefore, Paris, France, is a state in the United States. Explain why this argument is invalid. In your response, make sure to explain why the argument is not truth-preserving. The author of our textbook notes the problem of induction can help us become better thinkers by recognizing that many things we take for granted as true, may not be. For example, we take it for granted that every time we turn our key in our car’s ignition, the car will turn on. If, one day, our car does not turn on, the belief our car will always turn on is falsified (shown to be false). Describe an example of a belief that you take for granted every day. Explain how this belief is based on your, more general, belief that the future will be like the past. In other words, use the problem of induction in your explanation. Lastly, provide a scenario that falsifies your belief. In other words, provide a scenario that shows that your belief is false. For example, my belief that my car will always turn on was falsified this morning by the fact that my car would just not start. Notice that “our car will always turn on” is a generalization based on the fact that our car has always turned on (or turned on most of the time). Make sure the belief you choose to write about is a generalization as well. Provide your own example of an inductively strong (forceful) argument and an inductively weak argument. Describe why your first argument is strong and your second argument is weak. Computer essentials Smartphones, tablets, e-readers, and game consoles use operating systems like personal computers. Which operating system is on your phone? What are some of the pros and cons of your smartphone operating system compared to your personal computer operating system (e.g., do you have trouble loading Web pages on your phone)? If you do not use a smartphone, choose another device that uses an operating system for comparison. Microsoft Word 2016 is more than just a word processing tool. Think of a specific document type that you might create, such as a resume, and describe what you think are the most important tools to use in Word to make your document stand out. Business Law Courts generally will not consider the adequacy of consideration. Reviewing Case 10-2 in our textbook (page 220), the court had to consider whether $1 plus love and affection is adequate consideration. It ruled that, “Any consideration, however small, will support a promise. In the absence of fraud, the courts will not undertake to regulate the amount of the consideration. The parties are left to contract for themselves, taking for granted that the consideration is one value in the eyes of the law.” Is this the proper result? Should courts consider the adequacy of consideration? Why, or why not? As a general rule, the law says that a minor, a person under the age of 18 in most states, can disaffirm or cancel a contract they have made because anyone under the age of 18 is presumed to lack the knowledge and experience necessary to understand the obligations that a contract they have made imposes on them. Does that rule make sense? Is that rule too broad? Clearly, there are individuals who are younger than 18 years of age who understand the obligations that are assumed in a contract. If the rule did not exist, and courts had to consider every contract that a minor made and then wanted to disaffirm, the courts would be more crowded than they already are. Is the rule really a rule of convenience intended to relieve the courts of having to deal with deciding if minors knew what they were doing when they entered into a contract? Should this rule be discarded or modified? Susan, a wealthy widow, invited an acquaintance, John, to her home for a steak dinner on a specific date and at a specific time. John told Susan that he would be delighted to come to dinner and, eager to impress Susan, spent lavishly in preparing for the evening. His purchases included a new blazer, new shoes, an expensive floral arrangement, and champagne for Susan.At the agreed upon date and time, John arrived at Susan’s house only to find that she had left for the evening. John went home and sent Susan an email saying that he came for dinner but she was not home. The next day, Susan sent John an email saying that she was sorry that she had forgotten the dinner and had gone to the theater with friends.Assume that the facts given are admitted and not in dispute. Did Susan and John have a contract? Why, or why not? Rhodes, a wealthy businessman, and Axe, an artist, were involved in a business venture a few years ago, and Axe blamed Rhodes for the failure of that business venture. Despite the bad blood between the two, Rhodes, who was also an art collector, wanted one of Axe’s paintings because Axe was becoming more popular, and the value of his paintings was increasing.Rhodes sent Axe a letter stating that he would pay Axe $100,000 if Axe would agree to paint a painting specifically for Rhodes. When Axe received Rhodes’s letter, he was angry and wrote a quick letter to Rhodes not only rejecting Rhodes’s offer but saying that he thought Rhodes was a crook who should be in jail. As soon as Axe put the letter rejecting Rhodes’s offer in the mail slot at the post office, Axe had second thoughts about rejecting the offer and decided that he would paint a quick painting and take Rhodes’s $100,000. Axe immediately called Rhodes and said he accepted Rhodes offer and was ready to start on the painting immediately. The next day, Rhodes received the letter from Axe rejecting the offer. Now, Rhodes was angry because the letter said that Axe thought he was a crook and should be in jail, so Rhodes immediately called Axe and said the deal was cancelled.Was a contract between Rhodes and Axe formed? Why, or why not? If a contract was formed, did Rhodes have a legal basis for cancelling the contract? Principles of Marketing Explain the overall importance of marketing research. Please share an example of a company that has failed to do marketing research. Explain what the company did wrong and make certain to define the problem. In your response to your classmates explain what could it have done better. Identify a product for which you think that you paid either too little or too much. Identify the pricing strategy you think the company used (based on the Required Unit Resources) and explain why you think they made their decision. Do you agree or disagree with their choice? Why? Project Planning In Chapter 5 of your textbook reading in this unit, the authors referred to a “white elephant” within project management. Provide a real life example of a white elephant other than the ones discussed in the textbook. Discuss with your classmates the reasons why you classify this example as a white elephant. Major projects require a great deal of pre-planning so that all employees and subcontractors can use their time efficiently and effectively. Think about projects that you have been a part of. These could be in your personal or professional life. What are some ways that time has been wasted in these projects? If you had been the project manager of these projects, how would you have kept the projects on schedule? Business Law Courts generally will not consider the adequacy of consideration. Reviewing Case 10-2 in our textbook (page 220), the court had to consider whether $1 plus love and affection is adequate consideration. It ruled that, “Any consideration, however small, will support a promise. In the absence of fraud, the courts will not undertake to regulate the amount of the consideration. The parties are left to contract for themselves, taking for granted that the consideration is one value in the eyes of the law.” Is this the proper result? Should courts consider the adequacy of consideration? Why, or why not? As a general rule, the law says that a minor, a person under the age of 18 in most states, can disaffirm or cancel a contract they have made because anyone under the age of 18 is presumed to lack the knowledge and experience necessary to understand the obligations that a contract they have made imposes on them. Does that rule make sense? Is that rule too broad? Clearly, there are individuals who are younger than 18 years of age who understand the obligations that are assumed in a contract. If the rule did not exist, and courts had to consider every contract that a minor made and then wanted to disaffirm, the courts would be more crowded than they already are. Is the rule really a rule of convenience intended to relieve the courts of having to deal with deciding if minors knew what they were doing when they entered into a contract? Should this rule be discarded or modified? Susan, a wealthy widow, invited an acquaintance, John, to her home for a steak dinner on a specific date and at a specific time. John told Susan that he would be delighted to come to dinner and, eager to impress Susan, spent lavishly in preparing for the evening. His purchases included a new blazer, new shoes, an expensive floral arrangement, and champagne for Susan.At the agreed upon date and time, John arrived at Susan’s house only to find that she had left for the evening. John went home and sent Susan an email saying that he came for dinner but she was not home. The next day, Susan sent John an email saying that she was sorry that she had forgotten the dinner and had gone to the theater with friends.Assume that the facts given are admitted and not in dispute. Did Susan and John have a contract? Why, or why not? Rhodes, a wealthy businessman, and Axe, an artist, were involved in a business venture a few years ago, and Axe blamed Rhodes for the failure of that business venture. Despite the bad blood between the two, Rhodes, who was also an art collector, wanted one of Axe’s paintings because Axe was becoming more popular, and the value of his paintings was increasing.Rhodes sent Axe a letter stating that he would pay Axe $100,000 if Axe would agree to paint a painting specifically for Rhodes. When Axe received Rhodes’s letter, he was angry and wrote a quick letter to Rhodes not only rejecting Rhodes’s offer but saying that he thought Rhodes was a crook who should be in jail. As soon as Axe put the letter rejecting Rhodes’s offer in the mail slot at the post office, Axe had second thoughts about rejecting the offer and decided that he would paint a quick painting and take Rhodes’s $100,000. Axe immediately called Rhodes and said he accepted Rhodes offer and was ready to start on the painting immediately. The next day, Rhodes received the letter from Axe rejecting the offer. Now, Rhodes was angry because the letter said that Axe thought he was a crook and should be in jail, so Rhodes immediately called Axe and said the deal was cancelled.Was a contract between Rhodes and Axe formed? Why, or why not? If a contract was formed, did Rhodes have a legal basis for cancelling the contract?

Our team of vetted writers in every subject is waiting to help you pass that class. With keen editors and a friendly customer support team, we guarantee custom-written, original, high-quality papers. Get top grades.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now