I have attached the topic 2 and 3 assignments it says to use here. I also added my last assignment to help. The purpose of this assignment is to draft an internal business proposal presentation to sh
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS DOCUMENT Topic 3 STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS DOCUMENT Name of Stakeholder Description of Stakeholder Role of Stakeholder Level of Knowledge in Program Available Resources, Information, Influence, Money, Staff, Technology, etc. Level of Interest Level of Support Level of Influence Action Plan for Stakeholder Engagement Example: Call Center Manager Leader of the Call Center in Phoenix Project Sponsor High level of knowledge Funding of project and internal resources from call center High Positive High Maintain regular communication with stakeholder on progress and updates. clients they will be the service users, therefore our services will meet their preferences will pay for the services received low level of knowledge They will fund the project by paying for services. Moderate Positive Low do not make decisions investors The risk takers to fund our activities. they will be funding our project low level of knowledge They will fund the project by paying for services. High Positive Moderate do not make decisions engineers the qualified personnel to test and deliver our services involved in testing, installations and maintaining the parking spaces regularly High level of knowledge Actively participate in project development. High Positive High Maintain regular communication with stakeholder on progress and updates. security/police controlling the activities within the parking report and charge those destroying property and unauthorized parking low level of knowledge they will protect the resources and charge the wrongdoers Moderate Positive Moderate regular communication with the stakeholders regarding parking violations project managers the leaders during project implementation ensure that the project is achieved within the set time and cost High level of knowledge Actively participate in project development. High Positive High Maintain regular communication with stakeholder on progress and updates. sponsors The interest groups seeking to fund the project. responsible for donating the finances to develop the project low level of knowledge They will fund the project by paying for services. Moderate Positive Low do not make decisions Over the past decade, vehicle production and purchase have increased significantly. Additionally the need for better roads and more fuel has also increased gradually. Finally there has been an increase in parking space demand especially within the major cities and populated streets. However the automated and smart parking services are among the major government’s solutions. Therefore for this paper we will be analyzing the concept of parking space from the stakeholder’s point. We will be holding a discussion related to automated vehicle parking and promoting teamwork among the involved employees. Pala & Inanc (2007). For the smart parking services to succeed, we have first to locate the preferences and involved stakeholders. Several stakeholders will be involved in the process of developing this project, including; the clients. These will be the people involved in using the services; therefore, our services have to meet their demands and preferences. The users will pay for our services which will generate revenue and profits for resource acquisition and wages. Therefore without proper customer support, the services may not succeed. The investors will be the second group whose responsibility will be to fund our projects. For the project to succeed within the university, potential investors are willing to risk their money for project development. The Engineers is another potential group involved in testing, installations and maintaining the parking spaces regularly. This will ensure that once the services stop functioning, the executives will solve the problems. Will be responsible for developing the smart parking, ensuring that the system is highly effective and integrated with the old one. Additionally, the engineers will regularly test the services to ensure they are within the correct standards; additionally, they will keep researching potential ways to improve the services to improve customer satisfaction. Geng & Cassandras (2012). The university security is another group whose responsibility will be to control the events within the smart parking place by ensuring that people park within the authorized spots. If one destroys properly, they are charged immediately. Therefore the police will be essential in promoting peace and resource protection. Project managers will be responsible for ensuring that the project is achieved within the set time and cost. Additionally, the project manager will supervise other employees and check how the project progresses with regular maintenance of the destroyed parts. Our final group will be the project sponsors responsible for donating the finances to develop the project. The sponsors will include interest groups like investors, students, and governmental officials, who are willing to ensure that our project succeeds. Wang & He (2011). For our services to function effectively as predicted, the system should ensure that the clients can easily identify the right parking spots and have the autonomy to use their most preferred. There should also be an automated and continued monitoring system that ensures that those violating the parking laws are reported automatically for relevant actions against them. Finally, reports should be generated automatically regarding the utilization of the parking space and the financed generated. My opinion is that smart parking will be essential in reducing vehicle parking violations, problems in looking for the right spot and tracking of a parked vehicle’s positions. References Pala, Z., & Inanc, N. (2007, September). Smart parking applications using RFID technology. In 2007 1st Annual RFID Eurasia (pp. 1-3). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/4368108/ Geng, Y., & Cassandras, C. G. (2012). A new “smart parking” system infrastructure and implementation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 54, 1278-1287. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812043042 Wang, H., & He, W. (2011, April). A reservation-based smart parking system. In 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) (pp. 690-695). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5928901/
I have attached the topic 2 and 3 assignments it says to use here. I also added my last assignment to help. The purpose of this assignment is to draft an internal business proposal presentation to sh
BENCHMARK ASSIGNMENT 5 Topic 2 Date regarding Noncooperation amongst Managers   Reasons of noncooperation                 Week Day of the week Total number of noncooperation amongst managers Lack of Trust Individuals shirking their duties Skewes Influence over Decisions Stuck in Formation Others Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday 21 16 Monday Tuesday 19 Wednesday 25 10 Thursday 25 12 Friday 24 Monday 29 10 10 Tuesday 19 Wednesday 21 12 Thursday 19 Friday 24 Total 261 97 39 40 54 31 STEP 1: First, check the managers’ claim that there is noncooperation on specific days by plotting the combined data day-wise on a histogram. STEP 2: Plotting a scatter diagram for the total number of noncooperation amongst managers to analyze trends. The scatter plot is showing that the number of noncooperation amongst managers is increasing with time. This means that there is a presence of an increasing trend. STEP 3: Creating a Pareto chart a) Counting the total noncooperation in each category. b) Calculating the total cumulative count. C) Calculating the cumulative percentage for each noncooperation cause. Summary Report The analysis shows that the primary reason causing noncooperation amongst managers is: Lack of trust is the primary reason with a contribution of 85%. Stuck in information is the second main contribution with a contribution of 45%. Finally, individuals neglect their duties and Skewes Influence over Decisions with a contribution of 30% each. Mistrust is a significant issue, as illustrated by the analysis. While stuck in information is also a contributing factor, the management must give attention to stuck details and lack of trust to improve the noncooperation among the managers. References Dwivedi, Y. K., Shareef, M. A., Mukerji, B., Rana, N. P., & Kapoor, K. K. (2018). Involvement in emergency supply chain for disaster management: a cognitive dissonance perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 56(21), 6758-6773. Walters, D., Quinlan, M., Johnstone, R., & Wadsworth, E. (2016). Cooperation or resistance? Representing workers’ health and safety in a hazardous industry. Industrial Relations Journal, 47(4), 379-395.
I have attached the topic 2 and 3 assignments it says to use here. I also added my last assignment to help. The purpose of this assignment is to draft an internal business proposal presentation to sh
Business Proposal Purpose Statement The purpose of this business proposal is to identify how noncooperation among the managers affect employees’ relationship and stakeholders negatively impacting productivity and identify the strategies for improving cooperation and how it will positively impact the organization. Through this business proposal and adapting the recommendations which are provided in the proposal, the organization will be able to attain a 90% production growth on the teamwork action plans which will result in improved productivity and relationship between the employees, management, and the stakeholders. The organization will be able to improve in the areas they have got flaws by identifying specific areas for improvement and correcting the issues which were affecting them. Problem statement There are electronic supply organizations that are not progressing because of ignorance of adapting the teamwork strategy. From the statistics, they dictate that 65% of the organizations are unproductive. The benchmarking data collected indicated that noncooperation is among 90% of managers of the organizations assessed. When it comes to lack of trust there were 30% managers,17% of the individuals were shirking their duties. For 18% of individuals are being influenced by the skews concerning decisions,20% are stuck in the formation while there are 10% who are under the others category which can be observed from the figure below. For organizations that have applied the strategies are making huge profits. More so, the customers tend to purchase the goods as well as services from the organizations that are well organized starting with their numbers. Consequently, teamwork strategies in organizations are very critical in achieving effective productivity. Organizations ought to establish clear norms for accountability for the contributions of the managers to the efforts of the group. Through the application of the norms, communication between the managers becomes effective, and the inflow of the customers’ increases. Data and Research Findings Scatter diagram for the total number of noncooperation amongst managers to analyze trends. About the scatter plot, this is indicating that the number of noncooperation amongst the managers is increasing with time. This means that though this problem is being experienced it is continuing to increase with time. According to Arthur & Kim(2005), it hypothesized level of the cooperation, as well as trust amongst the staffs, has got an influence on how people take the risk at their places of work which leads to different pattern of sharing info. For these writers, the difference in the managing of the labor cooperation could result in the distinctive pattern for the sharing of information that might occur in the other work practice. The scatter diagram indicates an upward trend that is occurring due to lack of cooperation among the managers that negatively impacts the employees. This means that lack of cooperation impacts people’s trust negatively compared to what Arthur and Kim had identified. Due to having an upward trend in the scatter there are different reasons which result to this where there is lack of trust which is the primary reason contributing to 85% which result to noncooperation among the managers. Stuck in the information is a second one as presented on the scatter having a contribution of 45%. The final one is the skewes influences over the decisions that have got a contribution of 30 percent for each of them. Looking at the analysis and the presentation from the scatter it indicates that mistrust is the most significant issue. Though being stuck in the information is another contributing factor, management has to focus on stuck details as well as lack of trust for them to be able to improve the noncooperation which exists among managers in the organizations. Proposed Solution Pareto chart a) Counting the total noncooperation in each category. b) Calculating the total cumulative count. C) Calculating the cumulative percentage for each noncooperation cause. From the analysis, it is noted that several issues have to be dealt with by the organization. The graph above it identifies the main problems comprising of lacking trust, being stuck in the information, skews of influence in the decisions, individuals shirking their duties among others as the causes for the noncooperation among the employees. Finally, sharing knowledge could be advanced as the social dilemmas where the cooperation is the desired solution (Pais and Dos Santos, 2015). Solutions to proposed problems will comprise of adapting the teamwork strategies training which has to be implemented in organization for increasing the effective communication as well as productivity. If this strategy is adopted it will be vital for the organization since the managers will be able to communicate any issue that they are facing and will encourage employees to work as a team which will result in consultation hence the better being of the organization. The other importance of this will be attaining the set organizational goals which will result in inefficiency. Secondly, the company has to establish clear norms for accountability of managers’ contributions to the efforts of the group. Through this, the employees will feel valued hence encouraged to work. Finally, they have to focus on ensuring any issue that could result in mistrust is done away with to build confidence within the management and the organization. This will make it free for the employees and even managers to share any area they encounter a problem which will boost their relationship. Stakeholder Analysis and Benefits  For the organization, the issue of noncooperation among the managers is affecting the organization’s wellbeing to a great extent. In the solving of this matter, teamwork strategies have to be implemented in an organization for increasing the effectiveness of communication and productivity. Teamwork strategies are the major solutions for the problem. This paper will analyze the concept of implementing teamwork strategies from the stakeholder’s point of view. For the teamwork strategies to succeed we should first allocate what the involved stakeholders prefer. Several stakeholders will be involved in the process of development of this project including external clients, managers alongside regular workers. These are the people who are affected by what the organization goes through where in case of non-cooperation they are negatively impacted. For the users, if they pay for the services they receive which generate the revenues for the organization. Therefore, without having proper training of the team through the adoption of different strategies then the implementation will not succeed. Investors will be the other group who are tasked with funding the project we have in place. For the project to be implemented within the organization, the investors have to be willing to risk their funds and invest in the project for its implementation. The trainers are the other group that has to be involved in the project since they are the ones who are expected to provide the necessary training through the different strategies available to ensure they succeed in what they are doing. This will ensure they come up with the appropriate program required for training the management which will result in the success in the implementation of the project. The other vital group which has also to be included in this project are the consultants who are the ones to provide the proper strategies that the organization can adapt for it to succeed in its operations. The consultants are conversant in this field hence they are in a better position of selecting which training strategies are fit for the organization of this size making the work easier for the trainers to take the notes and start the training process. This will ensure that once the program comes to a close everything will be normal and the organization will be operating efficiently. In addition, the consultants will be doing a follow-up on the program to ensure successful implementation until cooperation is restored within the organization. The organization’s human resource department will be another group that will be tasked will supervision during the execution of the project. In case the trainers will fail to undertake the training activity they will be held responsible immediately. The project manager will be the ones who will be tasked with ensuring that this project is done within the set time and cost. The manager will also be tasked with the supervision of the other members of the team and check on the progress of the project. The final group which we will be engaging during this project are the sponsors that will be donating the funds towards the execution of the project (Wang and He,2011). Implementation Methods In this, we will embark on the project through assessing the needs for the project which could be established within organizational strategic, human resource, and individual developments plans. There should be a setting of the objectives for the project where any form of gaps has to be identified within this to know what is being dealt with. After this, an action plan has to be implemented where through this the theories which are necessary and the strategies have to be set. A budget for all this program and the time frame within which the [project is going to be carried out has to be set. In the costs, you have to detail a plan on how the funds for the project will be raised and who will be involved to be precise. You will have to implement what will then work for the project then revise after all. In addition, during this implementation phase, we will have to work closely with the consultants and the other experts in the area to guide so that mostly the budget set will be able to cater for all the expenses which will be incurred. More so, there will be meetings for a briefing on what is supposed to be undertaken, and for the people who have earlier on taken part in this kind of project, they will provide guidance. The final decision will be reached by the team which will be responsible for approving the action plan available and some employees will be involved at some stage to give their views concerning the project. References Arthur, J. B., & Kim, D. (2005). Gainsharing and knowledge sharing: the effects of labor– management co-operation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(9), 1564–1582 Pais, L., & dos Santos, N. R. (2015). Knowledge-sharing, cooperation, and personal development. In K. Kraiger, J. Passmore, N. R dos Santos & S. Malvezzi (Eds), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Training, Development, and Performance Improvement (pp. 278–302). UK, Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell Wang, H., & He, W. (2011, April). A reservation-based smart parking system. In 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) (pp. 690-695).