Instructions In this milestone, you will analyze the Fabricant Manufacturing Project and begin tasks related to initiation. To complete this assignment, review the Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric

Do you need academic writing help with your homework? Let us write your papers.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Instructions

In this milestone, you will analyze the Fabricant Manufacturing Project and begin tasks related to initiation.

To complete this assignment, review the Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric document.

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

Also, 100% free of plagiarism and completed on time!!!

Instructions In this milestone, you will analyze the Fabricant Manufacturing Project and begin tasks related to initiation. To complete this assignment, review the Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
QSO 640 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric Overview: In the final project, you will develop a complete project plan for a hypothetic al organization. Each milestone assignment will help you complete portions of the final project. In th is milestone, you will analyze the Fabricant Manufacturing Project (case study available in MindEdge) and begin tasks related to initiation. You will first define the project in the project charter duri ng the project initiation phase. Prompt: The goal of this milestone is to apply project management skills acquired in the first three modules to a real -world project or situation. The analysis of the Fabricant Manufacturing Project case study (in Mindedge ) should include an evaluation of the selection criteria, alignment with the organization strategic goals, project charter elements , project initiation approval, and stakeholder analysis (Template ). Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed: I. Project Initiation A. Identify the economic, technical, and organizational feasibility of the project. For instance, how is the project a viab le fit within the organization? B. Explain how the project aligns to the organization’s strategic goals utilizing the traceability matrix (in Mindedge) . C. Develop a project charter that includes a high -lev el scope of what is to be accomplished. D. Create a high -level timeline and cost estimate to complet e the project. E. Identify the concerns of the internal and external key project stakeholders . F. Compare the level of support from all key project stakeholders to i nform the course of action resul ting in success of the project. G. Complete the stakeholder analysis template . Guidelines for Submission: Your draft of the Project Initiation portion of your final project should adhere to the follo wing formatting requirements: 3 –4 pages, double -spaced, usin g 12 -point Times New Roman font and one -inch margins. Utilize table(s) within your document as you create t he high -level timeline and cost estim ate. You should use current APA -style guidelines for your citations and a reference list with a minimum of two sources. Critical Elements Proficient (100% ) Needs Improvement (75% ) Not Evident (0% ) Value Project Initiation: Feasibility Identifies the economic, technical, and organizational feasibility of the project and how the project is a viable fit within the organization Identifies the economic, technical, and organizational feasibility of the project , but does not discuss how the project is a via ble fit within the organization or is inaccurate or cursory Does not identify the economic, technical, and organizational feasibility of the project 10 Project Initiation: Strategic Goals Explains how the project aligns to the organization’s strategic goals Explains how the project aligns to the organization’s strategic go als, but explanation is inaccurate or cursory Does not describe how the project aligns to the organization’s strategic goals 15 Project Initiation: Project Charter Develops a project charter that includes a high -level scope of what is to be accomplishe d and is detailed appropriately Develops a project charter , but does not include a high -level scope of what is to be accomplished Does not develop a project charter 15 Project Initiation: High -Level Timeline Creates a high -level timeline and estimate of cost to complete the project Creates a high -level timeline and estimate of cost to complete the project, but response contains inaccuracies Does not create a high -level timeline or estimate of cost to complete the project 15 Project Initiation: Key Projec t Stakeholders Identifies the concerns of key project internal and external stakeholders Identifies the concerns of key project internal and external stakeholders, but response either contains inaccuracies or is overgeneralized Does not identify the conce rns of key project stakeholders 10 Project Initiation: Support Compares the level of support from all key stakeholders to inform the course of action of the project Compares the level of support from all key stakeholders, but discussion contains gaps or i naccuracies Does not compare the level of support from all key stakeholders 15 Project Initiation: Stakeholder Analysis Template Completes the stakeholder analysis template Completes the stakeholder analysis template, but template contains inaccuracies Does not complete the stakeholder analysis template 10 Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Total 100%
Instructions In this milestone, you will analyze the Fabricant Manufacturing Project and begin tasks related to initiation. To complete this assignment, review the Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
G ra d ed C ase S tu dy 1 , P art I P ro je ct S ele ctio n F ab ric an t C orp ora tio n m an ufa ctu re s a n d d is tr ib ute s h ig hly s p ecia liz ed m eta l p arts t o o ver 1 ,0 00 c lie n ts a cro ss th e N orth east. W ith s ta te -o f-th e-a rt f a cilitie s, F ab ric an t i s t h e l e ad er i n d esig nin g, p ro to ty pin g, a n d m an ufa ctu rin g e n gin eerin g f le x ib le m ate ria ls f o r s o la r p ow er, m ed ic al, a ero sp ace, a n d e le ctr ic p ow er ap plic atio ns. A s F ab ric an t h as g ro w n a n d e x pan ded i ts b ase o f s h are h old ers , i ts m is sio n h as e v olv ed f ro m m ere ly p ro vid in g quality p ro ducts a t a c o m petitiv e p ric e. T oday , t h e c o m pan y s tr iv es t o c re ate s h are h old er v alu e a n d dem onstr a te c o rp ora te s o cia l r e sp onsib ility b y c o ntin uin g t o b e a l e ad er i n e n erg y c o nse rv atio n, r e se arc h , a n d dev elo pm en t o f a d van ced t e ch nolo gie s. L ee F ein berg , t h e c o m pan y’s C EO , i s e ag er t o l iv e u p t o F ab ric an t’s p ublic c o m mitm en t b y e n gag in g i n activ itie s t h at d riv e c o ntin uous i m pro vem en t o n k ey s u sta in ab ility m etr ic s. S pecif ic ally , h e h as t a sk ed h is se n io r m an ag em en t t e am t o p ro pose p ro je cts t h at w ill a lig n w ith t h e f o llo w in g o bje ctiv es: 1 . Red uce e n erg y c o nsu m ptio n b y a m in im um o f 2 0% 2 . Rais e c o m munity c o nsc io usn ess o f e n vir o nm en ta l i s su es a n d c o ncern s 3 . Gen era te a r e tu rn o n i n vestm en t o f a t l e ast 1 5% A fte r s e v era l m onth s o f r e se arc h b y h er s ta ff, J a n ic e S co tt, t h e H ead o f S tr a te g ic P la n nin g f o r F ab ric an t, bro ught t h e f o llo w in g p ro je ct p ro posa ls f o r c o nsid era tio n: 1. Sola r p an el i n sta lla tio n o n t h e m ain m an ufa ctu rin g f a cility T his 2 00,0 00 s q uare f o ot m an ufa ctu rin g f a cility c o nsu m es 9 .5 m illio n k W h o f e le ctr ic ity p er y ear. T he f a cility has j u st o ver t w o a cre s o f r o ofto p t h at i s s u ita b le f o r s o la r p an el p la cem en t. A cco rd in g t o e stim ate s, t h is in sta lla tio n w ould g en era te a b out 7 00,0 00 k W h o f r e n ew ab le e n erg y p er y ear, w hile o ffs e ttin g o ver 5 00 t o ns QSO 6 40: P ro je ct M anagem ent Copyrig ht & co py; 2 014, % ye ar% M in dE dge In c. A ll r ig hts r e se rv e d. D uplic a tio n p ro hib it e d. < br> P M P, P M I- A C P, P M I- R M P, P M BO K, a nd th e P M I Regis te re d E duca tio n P ro vid er lo go a re r e gis te re d m ark s o f th e P ro je ct M anagem ent In stit u te , In c. of C O 2 . T he i n sta lla tio n o f 1 ,5 00 2 40-w att p hoto volta ic c ells w ould c o st a b out $ 700,0 00, n et o f f e d era l in vestm en t t a x c re d its . W ith e stim ate d e n erg y s a v in gs o f $ 50,0 00 p er y ear a n d a n nual s o la r r e n ew ab le e n erg y cre d its ( S R EC s) r e v en ue o f $ 70,0 00 p er y ear, t h e s o la r p an el i n vestm en t i s e x pecte d t o b re ak e v en i n 5 .6 years , w ith a 1 0-y ear r e tu rn o n i n vestm en t o f 2 0% ( $ 120,0 00 p er y ear f o r 1 0 y ears , w ith a d is c o unt r a te o f 7% ). T his f a cility i s a ls o i n a h ig hly v is ib le l o catio n a d ja cen t t o a m ajo r h ig hw ay , w ith 3 00,0 00 p eo ple d riv in g p ast th e b uild in g o n a d aily b asis . T he p ublic e x posu re t o t h e f a cility ‘s s o la r a rra y w ill r a is e c o m munity a w are n ess to r e n ew ab le e n erg y s o urc es a n d c re ate p ositiv e p erc ep tio n f o r F ab ric an t’s c o m mitm en t t o e n vir o nm en ta l su sta in ab ility . 2. In te rio r a n d e x te rio r r e tr o fit o f i n dustr ia l l ig htin g t h ro ughout f a cilitie s T he s e co nd p ro je ct p ro posa l i n volv es r e p la cin g h ig h e n erg y c o nsu m ptio n l ig htin g f ix tu re s i n a ll F ab ric an t fa cilitie s w ith m ore e ffic ie n t t e ch nolo gie s, i n clu din g t h e f o llo w in g: Rep la ce m eta l h alid es w ith L ED t e ch nolo gie s Rep la ce T -1 2 f lu ore sc en t l ig htin g t o T -8 V ap ortite f ix tu re s Retr o fit o ffic es a n d b re ak r o om s w ith s e n so rs a n d n ew f lu ore sc en t f ix tu re s In sta ll w ir e le ss s e n so rs a n d m otio n d ete cto rs t h ro ughout o ffic es, p ro ductio n s ta tio ns, a n d b re ak r o om s to a u to m atic ally t u rn o ff l ig hts T hese c h an ges a re e stim ate d t o p ro duce e n erg y s a v in gs o f o ver 1 .1 m illio n k W h p er y ear a s w ell a s $ 142,0 00 an nually i n u tility c o sts . A fte r e n erg y e ffic ie n cy i n cen tiv es a n d u tility p artn er r e b ate s, F ab ric an t’s t o ta l c o st o f th e u pgra d es i s e x pecte d t o b e i n t h e $ 65,0 00 t o $ 75,0 00 r a n ge s o t h e p ro gra m w ill p ro vid e i m med ia te fin an cia l a n d e n vir o nm en ta l r e tu rn s. I n t h e f ir s t y ear a lo ne, t h is p ro gra m i s l ik ely t o p ro duce a n 8 9% R O I. T o g en era te p ositiv e c o m munity a n d c lie n t a w are n ess f o r t h is s u sta in ab ility i n itia tiv e, S co tt r e co m men ds t h at F ab ric an t i n clu de t h e r e su lts i n t h e c o m pan y’s n ew sle tte r a n d c lie n t l ite ra tu re , a n d o n i ts w eb site . 3. Adoptio n o f l e ss e n erg y i n te n siv e w eld in g p ro cesse s i n p ro ductio n f a cilitie s A t h ir d p ro posa l i s t o s h if t f ro m t r a d itio nal f u sio n w eld in g p ro cesse s ( a rc w eld in g a n d l a se r w eld in g) t o fric tio n s tir w eld in g ( F SW ). I n a d ditio n t o p ro vid in g s o lu tio ns f o r p ers is te n t j o in in g p ro ble m s, F SW c o nsu m es le ss m ate ria l a n d e n erg y w hile r e d ucin g f u m es a n d g ase s. T he p ro pose d p ro je ct i s t o d ev elo p a p ro to ty pe sy ste m t h at p ro ves t h e s u ita b ility o f F SW f o r a r a n ge o f F ab ric an t’s w eld in g s itu atio ns ( e .g ., e n gin e co m ponen ts , h ig h p erfo rm an ce a ir c ra ft p arts , f u el t a n ks, e tc .) . B ase d o n a f e asib ility s tu dy u sin g t h e pro to ty pe, t h e t e am w ill d ecid e w heth er t o p urs u e i m ple m en ta tio n o f a F SW p ro cess d ev elo pm en t p la n (in clu din g d esig n, c o ntr o ls , a n d p ro cess k now le d ge) a t 1 2 w eld in g w ork sta tio ns. F SW r e d uces w eld in g e n erg y a n d m ate ria l c o nsu m ptio n b y a s m uch a s 7 0% ( e stim ate d s a v in gs o f $ 2,0 00 p er m ach in e), c o m pare d t o t r a d itio nal a rc w eld in g t e ch niq ues. F in ally , F SW s a v es a c o nsid era b le a m ount o f w eld in g t im e, c o m pare d t o a rc w eld in g, d ue t o h ig her w eld in g s p eed a n d f e w er a n cilla ry p ro cesse s. I n a ll, S co tt e x pects a s h if t t o F SW , w here f e asib le , t o s a v e $ 24,0 00 p er y ear. F SW m ach in e i n vestm en t, l ic en se s, t o ols , a n d p ers o nnel t r a in in g w ould b e a p pro xim ate ly $ 400,0 00. T he ex pecte d l if e o f F SW e q uip m en t i s f iv e y ears . S co tt b elie v es F ab ric an t’s c lie n ts , e sp ecia lly g overn m en t e n titie s, w ill p erc eiv e t h e u se o f F SW p ro cess a n d te ch nolo gy t o b e a c o m petitiv e a d van ta g e, i n dic atin g h ig h q uality , c o st e ffe ctiv en ess a n d e n erg y e ffic ie n cy . QSO 6 40: P ro je ct M anagem ent Copyrig ht & co py; 2 014, % ye ar% M in dE dge In c. A ll r ig hts r e se rv e d. D uplic a tio n p ro hib it e d. < br> P M P, P M I- A C P, P M I- R M P, P M BO K, a nd th e P M I Regis te re d E duca tio n P ro vid er lo go a re r e gis te re d m ark s o f th e P ro je ct M anagem ent In stit u te , In c. B efo re y o u m ove o n t o t h e n ext s e ctio n o f t h e c a se s tu dy, i d en tify t h e p ro ble m s a nd/o r i s su es t h at y o u’l l n eed to i n clu de i n y o ur a naly sis . D ocu m en t t h is i n fo rm atio n, a nd c o nsid er h ow y o u w ill i n te g ra te i t i n to y o ur eva lu atio n o f t h e p ro je ct. QSO 6 40: P ro je ct M anagem ent Copyrig ht & co py; 2 014, % ye ar% M in dE dge In c. A ll r ig hts r e se rv e d. D uplic a tio n p ro hib it e d. < br> P M P, P M I- A C P, P M I- R M P, P M BO K, a nd th e P M I Regis te re d E duca tio n P ro vid er lo go a re r e gis te re d m ark s o f th e P ro je ct M anagem ent In stit u te , In c.
Instructions In this milestone, you will analyze the Fabricant Manufacturing Project and begin tasks related to initiation. To complete this assignment, review the Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
G ra d ed C ase S tu dy 1 , P art I I In it ia tin g W hen F ein berg a n d h is s e n io r m an ag em en t t e am r e v ie w ed t h e l is t o f p ro pose d p ro je cts , t h ey w ere p re tty co nvin ced t h at t h ey s h ould p urs u e t h e i n dustr ia l l ig htin g r e tr o fit p ro je ct, t o t a k e a d van ta g e o f c u rre n t pro gra m s o ffe rin g t ie re d i n cen tiv es o n k W h r e d uctio ns. F or F ein berg , t h is p ro je ct s e em ed l ik e ” lo w h an gin g fru it” w hen i t c am e t o e n erg y s a v in gs f o r t h e c o m pan y. F ein berg a n d S co tt s p oke w ith S am M asso ni, t h e p ro gra m m an ag er f o r A m eric an G rid , t o l e arn a b out t h e utility ‘s l ig htin g r e tr o fit p ro gra m , i n clu din g i n cen tiv es a n d p ro gra m r e q uir e m en ts . A fte r t h at, t h ey a ssig ned a n in te rn al p ro je ct c o ord in ato r, V iv ia n L iu , t o s e rv e a s t h e p ro je ct m an ag er f o r t h e i n itia tiv e. L iu a lr e ad y h ad s e v era l t im e-c o nsu m in g p ro je cts o n h er p la te a n d w asn ‘t e ag er t o a d d a n oth er o ne, b ut s h e knew m ost o f h er c o lle ag ues w ere i n t h e s a m e b oat. S he k new s h e w ould h av e t o w ork a s e ffic ie n tly a s possib le , w hile t r y in g n ot t o g et b ogged d ow n i n t o o m an y u nnecessa ry s te p s. A fte r s e v era l m eetin gs w ith S co tt t o u nders ta n d p ro je ct r e q uir e m en ts a n d s c o pe, L iu c re ate d a s ta k eh old er l is t. B ecau se t h e l ig htin g r e tr o fit w as l a rg ely c o ncern ed w ith e n erg y e ffic ie n cy , s h e s e le cte d t h e s a m e s ta k eh old ers th at w ere i n clu ded o n a r e cen t p ro je ct i m ple m en tin g G PS t e ch nolo gy t o r e m ote ly m onito r i d lin g a n d f u el co nsu m ptio n p atte rn s o f F ab ric an t’s d is tr ib utio n v eh ic le s. F or t h is p artic u la r p ro je ct, h ow ev er, s h e a d ded M asso ni a s a n e x te rn al s ta k eh old er a n d p ro je ct c o nsu lta n t. S he f ig ure d i t w ould b e g ood t o i n clu de a t l e ast o ne ex te rn al p ers p ectiv e, a s l o ng a s i t w asn ‘t a n eg ativ e o ne. I f t h ere w as o ne t h in g L iu h ad l e arn ed o n p re v io us pro je cts , i t w as t h at n eg ativ e s ta k eh old ers a re i n cre d ib ly d if fic u lt a n d t im e-c o nsu m in g t o w ork w ith . Sta keh old er L is t Nam e Role In te re st Pow er Cla ssif ic atio n Lee F ein berg CEO Hig h Hig h Positiv e Ja n ic e S co tt Str a te g ic P la n nin g Med iu m Med iu m Positiv e Sam M asso ni Pro gra m M an ag er, A m eric an G rid Hig h Med iu m Positiv e Pau l C alla h an Dis tr ib utio n L ogis tic s M an ag er Med iu m Low Neu tr a l Tra n sp orta tio n S pecia lis ts Tru ck D riv ers Hig h Low Neu tr a l Elw ood V au ghn Syste m s/I T D ir e cto r Med iu m Low Neu tr a l Tru dy N oble Envir o nm en ta l M an ag er Hig h Hig h Neu tr a l Je ff S alv ato re PR /C om munic atio ns M an ag er Med iu m Low Neu tr a l W hen i d en tif y in g t h e l ig htin g r e tr o fit p ro je ct t e am , M asso ni a ls o l is te d t h e s a m e t e am o f p ro fe ssio nals f ro m QSO 6 40: P ro je ct M anagem ent Copyrig ht & co py; 2 014, % ye ar% M in dE dge In c. A ll r ig hts r e se rv e d. D uplic a tio n p ro hib it e d. < br> P M P, P M I- A C P, P M I- R M P, P M BO K, a nd th e P M I Regis te re d E duca tio n P ro vid er lo go a re r e gis te re d m ark s o f th e P ro je ct M anagem ent In stit u te , In c. th e G PS r e m ote m onito rin g t e ch nolo gy p ro je ct. F ro m w hat s h e c o uld t e ll, t h ese p eo ple a ll h ad a s o lid unders ta n din g o f t h e c o st/b en efit e co nom ic s a n d e n vir o nm en ta l i m pacts o f f o ssil f u el u sa g e a n d c o uld e n su re a s u ccessfu l o utc o m e. P ro je ct T ea m Viv ia n L iu Pro je ct M an ag er Sam M asso ni Pro gra m M an ag er, A m eric an G rid Pau l C alla h an Dis tr ib utio n L ogis tic s M an ag er Elw ood V au ghn Syste m s/I T D ir e cto r Tru dy N oble Envir o nm en ta l M an ag er Perry S ilv erm an Fin an ce A naly st Je ff S alv ato re PR /C om munic atio ns M an ag er Em mitt M cA ule y Occu patio nal S afe ty a n d H ealth l ia is o n M att S te v en s Str a te g ic P la n nin g A ssis ta n t B ecau se m ost o f t h e p ro je ct t e am m em bers h ad w ork ed t o geth er o n t h e G PS t e ch nolo gy p ro je ct a n d o th ers lik e i t, N oble s u ggeste d t h at t h ey r e v ie w t h e l e sso ns l e arn ed t h ey h ad c ap tu re d a t t h e c o nclu sio n o f t h e l a st pro je ct. O th ers c o ncu rre d , b ut L iu d id n ot b elie v e t h ose l e sso ns n eed ed t o b e c o nsid ere d , e sp ecia lly w ith s o m an y o th er t h in gs t o d o t o g et s ta rte d . ” I t h in k w e a ll k now w here t h in gs g ot o ff t r a ck t h e l a st t im e. I ‘m s u re w e w on’t m ak e t h e s a m e m is ta k es a g ain . B esid es, w e’l l h av e a c o nsu lta n t f ro m A m eric an G rid h elp in g u s o ut th is t im e.” L iu ‘s n ex t s te p w as t o e sta b lis h t h e p ro je ct’s b oundarie s a n d t o c o m munic ate c le ar a ccep ta n ce c rite ria t o t h e pro je ct t e am a n d s ta k eh old ers . S he e n gag ed M itc h C yte rs k i, F ab ric an t’s H ead o f F acilitie s, a n d s e v era l o f h is sta ff t o i d en tif y t h e p ro je ct’s a ccep ta n ce c rite ria b ecau se t h ey h ad t h e f u nctio nal k now le d ge p erta in in g t o a ll fa cilitie s’ i n fra str u ctu re a n d o pera tio n, i n clu din g l ig htin g s y ste m s. A ccep ta nce C rite ria : Rep la cem en t o f a ll m eta l h alid e a n d T -1 2 f lu ore sc en t l ig htin g f ix tu re s w ith e n erg y-e ffic ie n t o ptio ns In sta lla tio n o f s e n so rs i n a ll o ffic es, w are h ouse s, p ro ductio n f a cilitie s, a n d b re ak r o om s Base lin e c o m pute r s im ula tio n m odel t o m easu re a n d v erif y o ngoin g e n erg y s a v in gs f ro m t h e p ro je ct Lif e c y cle c o st a n aly sis a n d e co nom ic e v alu atio n f o r e ach n ew f ix tu re Docu m en ta tio n o f m ain te n an ce s ta n dard s A fte r L iu s h are d t h e s ta k eh old er l is t a n d a ccep ta n ce c rite ria w ith F ein berg a n d S co tt t o s o lic it t h eir i n put, s h e QSO 6 40: P ro je ct M anagem ent Copyrig ht & co py; 2 014, % ye ar% M in dE dge In c. A ll r ig hts r e se rv e d. D uplic a tio n p ro hib it e d. < br> P M P, P M I- A C P, P M I- R M P, P M BO K, a nd th e P M I Regis te re d E duca tio n P ro vid er lo go a re r e gis te re d m ark s o f th e P ro je ct M anagem ent In stit u te , In c. to ok a m om en t t o c h eck h er e m ail. T here w as a m essa g e f ro m K en S im mons, o ne o f t h e p ro ductio n f o re m en , re la y in g c o m pla in ts h is s ta ff h ad a b out t h e u pco m in g l ig htin g r e p la cem en t w ork i n t h eir a re a o f t h e s h op flo or. T hey d id n ot w an t t o d eal w ith t h e m ess a n d d is ru ptio n t h at t h is w as g oin g t o c au se , e sp ecia lly w here th ere d id n’t s e em t o b e a n yth in g w ro ng w ith t h e e x is tin g l ig htin g. F urth erm ore , t h ey w ere u nw illin g t o w ork an y o vertim e h ours t o c atc h u p o n l o st s h if t p ro ductiv ity . L iu h ad a lr e ad y h eard s im ila r c o m pla in ts f ro m o th er peo ple a b out t h e p ro je ct s o s h e d ecid ed t o s k ip h er l u nch b re ak a n d t a k e t h e t im e t o d ra ft h er o w n r e p lie s t o S im mons a n d o th er ” n eg ativ e” c o nstitu en ts i n o rd er t o r e fu te e ach i n div id ual c o m pla in t. B efo re y o u m ove o n t o t h e n ext s e ctio n o f t h e c a se s tu dy, i d en tify t h e p ro ble m s a nd/o r i s su es t h at y o u’l l n eed to i n clu de i n y o ur a naly sis . D ocu m en t t h is i n fo rm atio n, a nd c o nsid er h ow y o u w ill i n te g ra te i t i n to y o ur eva lu atio n o f t h e p ro je ct. QSO 6 40: P ro je ct M anagem ent Copyrig ht & co py; 2 014, % ye ar% M in dE dge In c. A ll r ig hts r e se rv e d. D uplic a tio n p ro hib it e d. < br> P M P, P M I- A C P, P M I- R M P, P M BO K, a nd th e P M I Regis te re d E duca tio n P ro vid er lo go a re r e gis te re d m ark s o f th e P ro je ct M anagem ent In stit u te , In c.
Instructions In this milestone, you will analyze the Fabricant Manufacturing Project and begin tasks related to initiation. To complete this assignment, review the Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
G ra d ed C ase S tu dy 1 , P art I II P ro je ct P la n nin g F or p ro je ct p la n nin g p urp ose s, L iu d is tr ib ute d t h e p ro je ct s c o pe s ta te m en t b elo w a s t h e r e q uir e m en ts docu m en ta tio n f o r t h e t e am a n d a s p rim ary i n put t o t h e p ro je ct c h arte r. B ecau se t h e p ro je ct w as e x pecte d t o hav e a s h ort d ura tio n, s h e d ecid ed t h at a w ork b re ak dow n s tr u ctu re w ould b e u nnecessa ry . P ro je ct S co pe S ta te m en t: F ab ric an t’s p ro pose d i n dustr ia l l ig htin g r e tr o fit p ro je ct w ill a im t o i d en tif y a n d r e p la ce t h e m ost e n erg y- in te n siv e l ig htin g f ix tu re s i n a ll o ffic e a n d p ro ductio n w ork sp aces i n o rd er t o a ch ie v e s ig nif ic an t c o st s a v in gs an d r e d uce e n erg y c o nsu m ptio n. T his p ro je ct w ill i n clu de d eta ile d f in an cia l a n aly sis a n d e n erg y u sa g e base lin e m odelin g t o e n su re s u ccess a n d c o ntin uous e ffic ie n cy i m pro vem en t g oin g f o rw ard . T he i n itia l c o st e stim ate f o r t h is p ro je ct i s $ 310,0 00, w hic h i s e x pecte d t o b e o ffs e t b y i n cen tiv es a n d r e b ate s of $ 245,0 00. S pecif ic D eliv era b le s 1 . Com pre h en siv e e n erg y a u dit o f e ach b uild in g; Docu m en t e x is tin g l ig htin g f ix tu re s a n d t y pes, i n clu din g h ousin gs, d im en sio ns, a n d m eth od o f in sta lla tio n t h at m ust b e a d dre sse d a s p art o f r e tr o fit r e co m men datio ns Measu re a ll e x is tin g l ig htin g l e v els o f e ach s p ace a n d f u nctio ns/p ers o nnel t h at o pera te t h ere 2 . Reco m men datio ns f o r t a rg ete d l ig htin g s y ste m s a n d c o st- e ffe ctiv e r e p la cem en t t e ch nolo gie s Dete rm in e f in al q uan tity , t y pe, a n d l o catio n o f e x is tin g f ix tu re s, l a m ps, a n d b alla sts t o b e r e p la ced Id en tif y a re as t h at w ill h av e o ccu pan cy c o ntr o ls o r m otio n d ete cto rs t o t u rn o ff l ig hts w hen s p ace is u noccu pie d Pro vid e t o ta l n um ber o f r e co m men ded l ig htin g c o m ponen ts a n d r e la te d c o sts 3 . Lif e c y cle c o st a n aly sis a n d e co nom ic e v alu atio n t h at f a cto rs i n c o st, m ain te n an ce c o st, a n d u tility c o st over t h e e x pecte d l if e o f t h e b uild in g l ig htin g r e tr o fit 4 . Waste m an ag em en t p la n f o r d is p osa l o f h azard ous m ate ria ls , s u bm itte d i n a cco rd an ce w ith E PA guid elin es 5 . Pro cu re m en t o f n ecessa ry r e tr o fit m ate ria ls a n d e le ctr ic al c o m ponen ts 6 . Deta ile d d em olitio n a n d i n sta lla tio n r e q uir e m en ts , i n clu din g p ro ced ure s t o s h ut d ow n e le ctr ic , d is a rm fir e a la rm s y ste m , r e m ove m ate ria ls f ro m p ro perty , a n d p ro te ct c o m pute r a n d o th er e q uip m en t 7 . Com ple tio n o f a ll n ecessa ry p erm it a p plic atio ns a n d c ertif ic ate s 8 . Pla n t o c o m ply w ith a ll O ccu patio nal S afe ty a n d H ealth P ro gra m r e q uir e m en ts ( c o nta in m en t o f d ust, deb ris , c o nta m in an ts ) 9 . Subm is sio n o f d ra w in gs a n d c o nstr u ctio n p hase s c h ed ule 10 . Com ple tio n o f P hase 1 l ig htin g r e p la cem en t: C orp ora te o ffic es 11 . Com ple tio n o f P hase 2 l ig htin g r e p la cem en t: P ro ductio n s h op o ffic es a n d b re ak r o om s 12 . Com ple tio n o f P hase 3 l ig htin g r e p la cem en t: P ro ductio n f lo or 13 . Com ple tio n o f P hase 4 l ig htin g r e p la cem en t: W are h ouse a n d p ark in g l o ts 14 . In sta lla tio n o f s e n so rs a n d m otio n d ete cto rs 15 . Deliv ery o f c o m pute r m odel w ith b ase lin e e n erg y u sa g e a n d a u to m ate d t r a ck in g s y ste m 16 . Subm is sio n o f p ro je ct c lo se -o ut d ocu m en ta tio n B efo re y o u m ove o n t o t h e n ext s e ctio n o f t h e c a se s tu dy, i d en tify t h e p ro ble m s a nd/o r i s su es t h at y o u’l l n eed QSO 6 40: P ro je ct M anagem ent Copyrig ht & co py; 2 014, % ye ar% M in dE dge In c. A ll r ig hts r e se rv e d. D uplic a tio n p ro hib it e d. < br> P M P, P M I- A C P, P M I- R M P, P M BO K, a nd th e P M I Regis te re d E duca tio n P ro vid er lo go a re r e gis te re d m ark s o f th e P ro je ct M anagem ent In stit u te , In c. to i n clu de i n y o ur a naly sis . D ocu m en t t h is i n fo rm atio n, a nd c o nsid er h ow y o u w ill i n te g ra te i t i n to y o ur eva lu atio n o f t h e p ro je ct. QSO 6 40: P ro je ct M anagem ent Copyrig ht & co py; 2 014, % ye ar% M in dE dge In c. A ll r ig hts r e se rv e d. D uplic a tio n p ro hib it e d. < br> P M P, P M I- A C P, P M I- R M P, P M BO K, a nd th e P M I Regis te re d E duca tio n P ro vid er lo go a re r e gis te re d m ark s o f th e P ro je ct M anagem ent In stit u te , In c.
Instructions In this milestone, you will analyze the Fabricant Manufacturing Project and begin tasks related to initiation. To complete this assignment, review the Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
G ra d ed C ase S tu dy 1 , P art I V T he P ro je ct C harte r A s t h e p ro je ct s p onso r, J a n ic e S co tt p ro ceed ed t o w rite t h e p ro je ct c h arte r t o a u th oriz e t h e l ig htin g r e tr o fit pro je ct a n d d efin e h ig h l e v el d eta ils : Pro je ct Title In dustr ia l L ig htin g R etr o fit Date Octo ber 8 , 2 013 Pro je ct purp ose Rep la ce e x is tin g i n te rio r a n d e x te rio r l ig htin g i n a ll F ab ric an t w ork sp aces, w are h ouse s, a n d bre ak r o om s w ith n ew t e ch nolo gie s Pro je ct obje ctiv es Fab ric an t’s s tr a te g ic o bje ctiv es a re t h e f o llo w in g: c re ate s h are h old er v alu e a n d d em onstr a te co rp ora te s o cia l r e sp onsib ility b y c o ntin uin g t o b e a l e ad er i n e n erg y c o nse rv atio n, r e se arc h , an d d ev elo pm en t o f a d van ced t e ch nolo gie s. Pro je ct deliv era b le s See l is t i n p ro je ct s c o pe s ta te m en t Pro je ct pers o nnel Pro je ct M an ag er Sam M asso ni, A m eric an G rid P ro gra m M an ag er Tru dy N oble , E nvir o nm en ta l M an ag er Pau l C alla h an , D is tr ib utio n L ogis tic s M an ag er Elw ood V au ghn, S yste m s/I T D ir e cto r Perry S ilv erm an , F in an ce A naly st Je ff S alv ato re , P R /C om munic atio ns M an ag er Em mitt M cA ule y , O SH A l ia is o n Matt S te v en s, S tr a te g ic P la n nin g A ssis ta n t Req uir e d s k ill s e ts : i n dustr ia l l ig htin g e x pertis e ‐ u nders ta n din g o f a p pro pria te l ig htin g co nditio ns f o r v ario us w ork sp aces a n d f a cto ry f lo or a ctiv ity ; e x pertis e i n l ig htin g t e ch nolo gie s an d e le ctr ic al w ir in g; f in an cia l m odelin g; u nders ta n din g o f p ublic i n cen tiv e p ro gra m s; en vir o nm en ta l i m pact a sse ssm en t; h azard ous m ate ria l e x pertis e ; s a fe ty r e g ula tio ns; p ublic re la tio ns c o m munic atio n; w ir e le ss s e n so r t e ch nolo gy, t o ols a n d i m ple m en ta tio n; p ro gra m min g; sta k eh old er c o m munic atio n, i n clu din g u nio ns Ris k s Costs w ill e x ceed e stim ate s a n d R O I w ill b e l e ss t h an e x pecte d Team m em bers d o n ot p osse ss a ll n ecessa ry s k ills t o c arry o ut n ecessa ry p ro je ct a ctiv itie s Rep la cem en t w ork w ill d is ru pt p ro ductio n a ctiv itie s a n d d ela y o utp ut New t e ch nolo gie s w ill f a il t o d eliv er e x pecte d e n erg y e ffic ie n cie s Rem oval a n d d is p osa l o f h azard ous m ate ria ls i n o ld l ig htin g s y ste m s Sch ed ule su m mary Thre e m onth s f ro m k ic k off Budget su m mary Pro je ct c o st e stim ate o f $ 310,0 00, w ith e x pecte d o ffs e ts o f $ 245,0 00 M easu ra b le su ccess crite ria Dem onstr a te d r e d uctio n i n e n erg y c o nsu m ptio n, a s m easu re d i n c o m paris o n t o b ase lin e au dit Im pro ved l ig htin g c o nditio ns QSO 6 40: P ro je ct M anagem ent Copyrig ht & co py; 2 014, % ye ar% M in dE dge In c. A ll r ig hts r e se rv e d. D uplic a tio n p ro hib it e d. < br> P M P, P M I- A C P, P M I- R M P, P M BO K, a nd th e P M I Regis te re d E duca tio n P ro vid er lo go a re r e gis te re d m ark s o f th e P ro je ct M anagem ent In stit u te , In c. Oth er pro je ct lim ita tio ns TB D A s y o u c o m ple te t h is l a st s e ctio n o f t h e c a se s tu dy, i d en tify t h e p ro ble m s a nd/o r i s su es t h at y o u’l l n eed t o in clu de i n y o ur a naly sis . D ocu m en t t h is i n fo rm atio n, a nd c o nsid er h ow y o u w ill i n te g ra te i t i n to y o ur eva lu atio n o f t h e p ro je ct. QSO 6 40: P ro je ct M anagem ent Copyrig ht & co py; 2 014, % ye ar% M in dE dge In c. A ll r ig hts r e se rv e d. D uplic a tio n p ro hib it e d. < br> P M P, P M I- A C P, P M I- R M P, P M BO K, a nd th e P M I Regis te re d E duca tio n P ro vid er lo go a re r e gis te re d m ark s o f th e P ro je ct M anagem ent In stit u te , In c.
Instructions In this milestone, you will analyze the Fabricant Manufacturing Project and begin tasks related to initiation. To complete this assignment, review the Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
Stakeholder Analysis Template Name Role Interest Power Classification

Our team of vetted writers in every subject is waiting to help you pass that class. With keen editors and a friendly customer support team, we guarantee custom-written, original, high-quality papers. Get top grades.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper