pecifically, the following critical elements must be addressed: II. Offender Risk Assessment (Case Scenario 2) a) Assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard (psychometrics)
PSY 622 Milestone Two : Case Scenario 2 Guidelines and Rubric (Offender Risk Assessment) Prompt: Review the collateral information of Case Scenario 2. In the Assessment Data section , review the raw data of the IORNS . A ppropriately interpret the scores. Based on your review o f Therapeutic Risk Typologies , provide a one – to two -page recommendations report for parole. Specifically , the following critical elements must be addressed: II. Offender Risk Assessment (Case Scenario 2) a) Assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard (psychometrics). In other words, what is the known or potential error rate? Has the data been derived using reliable methods? Is the data valid and reliable with regard to the scientific me tho d? b) Evaluate the interview information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process. Substantiate your claims with specific research. c) Evaluate the collateral information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process. Substantiate your claims with specific research. d) Create a recommendations report for risk management based on the above elements. Justify your position with specific scholarly research. e) Be sure your recom mendations report aligns with the ethical guidelines of a professional psychology association. Note: You do not need to belong to an organization, but rather may view the ethical guidelines on the website of th e organization of your choice. Guidelines fo r Submission: The recommendations report should follow these formatting guidelines: 1 –2 pages , double spacing, 12 -point T imes New Roman font, one -inch margins, and at least three citations in APA format. Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integra ted rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instruction s. Critical Elements Proficient (100% ) Needs Improvement (75 %) Not Evident (0% ) Value Offender Risk Assessment: Daubert Comprehensively assesses the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard Assesses the extent to which the cas e study data set meets the Daubert standard but with gaps in accuracy or detail Does not assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard 18 Offender Risk Assessment: Interview Information Evaluates interview information appro priately for its implications in the risk assessment process and substantiates claims with specific research Evaluates information but evaluation is not appropriate to the situation, or does not substantiate claims with research Does not evaluate interview information 18 Offender Risk Assessment: Collateral Information Evaluates collateral information appropriately for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process and substantiates claims with specific research Evaluates collateral in formation but evaluation is not appropriate to the situation, or does not substantiate claims with research Does not evaluate collateral information 18 Offender Risk Assessment: Recommendations Proposes appropriate recommendations and justifies with resea rch Proposes recommendations that are not appropriate to the situation, or does not justify with research Does not propose recommendations 18 Offender Risk Assessment: Ethical Guidelines Employs appropriate ethical guidelines of a professional organizatio n in making recommendations Employs ethical guidelines but guidelines are not appropriate to the situation or are not supported by a professional organization Does not employ ethical guidelines 18 Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling , or syntax Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling , or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, gramma r, spelling , or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Ear ned Total 100%