submit to the M5 Assignment 2 a mock forensic assessment report based on a patient in a selected vignette. Provide your diagnostic impressions based on the DSM-5 criteria.Complete the following:Improv

Do you need academic writing help with your homework? Let us write your papers.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

submit to the

M5 Assignment 2

a mock forensic assessment report based on a patient in a selected vignette. Provide your diagnostic impressions based on the DSM-5 criteria.

Complete the following:


  • Improve your interview and referral questions for the case vignette you selected in M1 Assignment 3

    . Using this case vignette, add to your referral questions by integrating the feedback that you received from your instructor in

    M4 Assignment 2

    on your mock interview questions and formulated hypothesis on why the individual needs the referral.


Example Referral Questions

:

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now
  • As a forensic mental health professional, what factors do you need to consider in your psychological testing for the forensic assessment report?
  • What are the pertinent multicultural consideration?
  • What behavioral observations do you make about the client by reading the case vignette?
  • What are your assessment options in working with the client?
  • What standard and accepted psychological tests might you apply to your client in a forensic setting? Select from the instruments you researched in

    M3 Assignment 2 RA

    .
  • How will you recognize and evaluate your client’s offender behaviors associated with malingering and deception? What theoretical orientation do you want to use in this case for your treatment recommendations?
  • What is the case scenario that you have selected?
  • What is the reason for referral?
  • What is the purpose of the forensic assessment and report?
  • What is the nature of the problem presented in your selected case vignette?
  • What is the context in which the forensic assessment report will be used?
  • What is the background of your client? What are the symptoms displayed by your client and their significance in this case?
  • What is the mental status of your client? Be sure to elaborate on every major component addressed in the mental status examination.
  • What interview type and approach did you use with your client?
  • What tests are appropriate to use in your forensic assessment report? Identify one intelligence test, one objective personality test, and one projective test.
  • What collateral information will you use in the process of the evaluation?
  • How will you present your impressions of the client?

  • Revise your copy of Forensic Mental Health Professional Individual Assessment Report on the basis of your instructor’s feedback.

    Using the

    Forensic Mental Health Professional Individual Assessment Report

    template that you downloaded for

    M4 Assignment 2

    , revise your evaluation and interpretation of the information provided to you in the case vignette that you selected. Synthesize the information you collected to create a

    forensic mental health professional individual assessment report

    . Your findings should be in a report format. In a 10- to 12-page report, include only the following components:


    • Reason for Referral

      : Explain the objective of your case vignette analysis, clearly bringing out the aspects or reasons that motivated you to carry out the study.

    • Presentation

      : Create mock interview data and collateral information (you are to identify the questions to ask in the interview). Provide a synopsis of the interview. To support the mental status of your client, provide data based on your forensic assessment report and the mental status components you have identified.

    • Current Life Situation and Background Information

      : Explain the problem provided in your selected case vignette using the interview and mental status data. How does the data relate to the background and multicultural characteristics of your client and your behavioral observations?

    • Objective Testing

      : Identify the assessment instruments you would recommend to evaluate the client and explain the rationale for your recommendations. Describe the objective tests you have selected and their use. How did you apply these tests to your selected case vignette? According to your study, what is your analysis of the symptoms displayed by your client? What ethical and multicultural issues do you need to address? You will apply what you have learned from M3 Assignment 2 RA to this section.
    • Provide your diagnostic impressions based on DSM-5 criteria. What is your principal diagnosis? What is your secondary diagnosis? Are there other conditions that may be the focus of clinical attention to consider?

    • Conclusion and Recommendations

      : What is your hypothesis after taking into account the mental status examination, the interview, personality tests, and the symptom analysis? Explain your hypothesis and substantiate it using instances from your case study. Discuss your results with conclusions and recommendations. The final version of

      Forensic Mental Health Professional Individual Assessment Report

      should contain all the assigned components and the corresponding information and include revisions and improvements based on your feedback from

      M4 Assignment 2

      .

  • Synthesize the data and write a reflection statement in 2–3 pages.

    In a separate document, address the following:

    • Describe your professional role and relationship with the court and the third party requesting the assessment or evaluation.
    • Explain the hypothesis you have formulated.
    • Explain why you chose the tests for the assessment of the client.
    • Discuss potential ethical dilemmas that might arise in your assessment of the client.
    • Discuss the pertinent multicultural perspectives you considered.
    • Explain how you would prepare yourself to defend your evaluation in the court setting or to relevant third parties. Be sure to support your explanation with professional literature.
    • If you recommended treatment for your client, discuss the evidence-based approaches used with the disorder you diagnosed.
    • Discuss the influence of cultural factors on the assessment process. The final version of

      Forensic Mental Health Professional Individual Assessment Report

      should contain all the assigned components and the corresponding information and include revisions and improvements based on your feedback from

      M4 Assignment 2

      .

  • Synthesize the data and write a reflection statement in 2–3 pages

    . In a separate document, address the following:
  • Describe your professional role and relationship with the court and the third party requesting the assessment or evaluation.
  • Explain the hypothesis you have formulated.
  • Explain why you chose the tests for the assessment of the client.
  • Discuss potential ethical dilemmas that might arise in your assessment of the client.
  • Discuss the pertinent multicultural perspectives you considered.
  • Explain how you would prepare yourself to defend your evaluation in the court setting or to relevant third parties. Be sure to support your explanation with professional literature.
  • If you recommended treatment for your client, discuss the evidence-based approaches used with the disorder you diagnosed.
  • Discuss the influence of cultural factors on the assessment process.

Your final deliverables are:

  • A selected case vignette
  • A list of interview and referral questions
  • The assessment template
  • The final assessment report
  • A reflection statement

Your report and reflection statement combined should be approximately 12–15 pages. You are to utilize outside resources in your reflection statement only.

All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.


Submission Details

:

The LASA is worth 300 points and will be graded according to the following rubric:


Assignment 3 Grading Criteria

Proficient

Maximum Points

Create a list of mock-interview questions that you would ask the person in your selected vignette. Creation of mock-interview question list is based on a chosen vignette and it is appropriate and complete.  48    Create a list of referral questions in relation to your chosen vignette. Created referral question list in relation to one’s chosen vignette is complete and appropriate  48    Discuss pertinent multicultural considerations for interview and referral questions, assessments, findings and recommendations. Questions are multiculturally sensitive and appropriate. Cultural influences are noted in the selection of assessments. Cultural sensitivity is evident in the findings and recommendations.  48    Synthesize all of the information to create a complete Forensic Mental Health Professional Individual Assessment Report that includes all required components (i.e. reason for referral, presentation data, background data, objective testing) and based on diagnostic impressions based on DSM-5. Synthesis of the information to create a complete Forensic Mental Health Professional Individual Assessment Report that includes all required components (i.e. reason for referral, presentation data, background data, objective testing) and based on diagnostic impressions based on DSM-IV-TR is complete, concise and accurate.  64    Synthesize data and write a reflection Statement answering all seven required questions. Analysis of data in the form of a Reflection Statement answering all seven required questions is complete, detailed and accurate. Several outside resources were utilized.  64    Writing is generally clear and in an organized manner. It demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and generally displays accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation. Errors are few, isolated, and do not interfere with reader’s comprehension.

Citations in text and at the end of the document are in correct APA format. Writing is generally clear and in an organized manner. It demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and generally displays accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation. Errors are few, isolated, and do not interfere with reader’s comprehension. Citations in text and at the end of the document are in correct APA format.  28

Total:


300

submit to the M5 Assignment 2 a mock forensic assessment report based on a patient in a selected vignette. Provide your diagnostic impressions based on the DSM-5 criteria.Complete the following:Improv
RUNNING HEAD: EVALUATION TEST CASE Evaluation Test Case The case scenario which I have selected involves a lady charged with burglary for being in possession of her neighbor’s property. The lady referred to as Ms. G, who was caught by the police and seems not to understand why she’s under arrest. According to the police reports, during the time of arrest, the lady was intoxicated. Again, police reports indicate that Ms. G brother had told them that she was involved in selling drugs and doing odd jobs. The upbringing of Ms. G seems to have been difficult since she lost her parents at a tender age of Four years. Again, she was separated with her brother and only reconnected after she was eighteen years. Despite this reconnection, her brother says indicates that they have not has a close relationship since then Ms. G has continuously been moving around the country. Police suggest that Ms. G exhibits paranoid behaviors and have no history of mental treatment. Ms. G has refused to take plea bargaining and requested to be brought to the judge directly even without the help of defense counsel which she had been offered. The reason for referral, in this case, is to confirm whether Ms. G is competent to stand trial. The referral wants to verify whether there is any evidence on malingering for mental illness. This is the most appropriate forensic evaluation to conduct on this case based on several reasons. Ms. G seems to have some mental issue which affects her ability to understand charges before him. She has exhibited behaviors which indicate that she cannot coordinate with her defense since she refused to have a defense team. However, there is no history of her mental treatment since childhood. Her brother and Ms. G have confirmed this also denies any therapy. This forensic test aims to evaluate whether Ms. G is fit to stand trial before a judge. The purpose of this forensic evaluation is to determine whether there is any mental disorder or impairment which Ms. G is currently having. The report will go further to explain the severity of the mental disorder is present. And explain into details whether the disorder or impairment affects Ms. G ability to understand her charges and the entire legal process correctly. Also, the assessment and report will aim at uncovering whether there is potential malingering for mental illness. This is prompted by the fact that Ms. G has had no prior medical history of mental illness. This assessment and report will also provide the answer as to whether Ms. G Is fit to stand trial and offer recommendations on how they can be made competent to stand trial if not found fit. The client seems to have some mental issues which have been disturbing her. Basing from the facts from her history, Ms. G has possibly encountered a problematic life without parental love and care. This is attributed from the fact that her parents died when she was young which led to her growing up in foster care. Foster care can be a traumatizing experience for a human being. As a result, Ms. could have developed a mental disorder due to this experience. Again, by doing odd jobs and living with boyfriends to survive can be an indicator of her traumatizing and challenging life. There could be some mental impairments to Ms. G due to drug use. According to the police reports, they arrested Ms. G who was already intoxicated and had drugs. Again, her brother confirmed to the police that Ms. G was involved in selling drugs. Drugs could have taken a toll on her and cause mental impairments — one of the probable reasons as to why she appears to be hyperactive and paranoid. My professional role and relationship with the court is to provide expert opinion on the status of Ms. G. This will involve giving professional feedback and correspondence where necessary or needed. I only maintain a professional relationship with the court to help in the case of Ms. G. I have a professional role with the third party of proving that MS. G indeed is not fit for trial. The relationship between the third party and I remain professional as I try to look at the available evidence to show how unfit Ms. G. is in regard to trial at the court. According to my hypothesis, Ms. G is not fit to stand trial. Several factors inform this. First, Ms. G has been affected by the traumatic events of losing her parents when she was young — resulting in mental disturbances which have gone untreated for all her life. Due to this factor, her psychic ability to make reasonable judgment has been affected. Again, Ms. G has been using drugs for a long time. This use of drugs has led to mental impairments. Ms. G cannot be able to understand her crime since her rational thinking has been affected using drugs and mental disturbance brought by the tragic event of losing her parents. Therefore, Ms. G cannot comprehend the charges against her and the penalties which she might face. Again, she cannot effectively cooperate with defense counsel even if it’s provided for her (Glancy & et al., 2015).   Reference Glancy, G. D., & Et al. (2015). AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Assessment. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 3-53.

Our team of vetted writers in every subject is waiting to help you pass that class. With keen editors and a friendly customer support team, we guarantee custom-written, original, high-quality papers. Get top grades.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper