Take a moment to review the details of this assignment below and gather any necessary files. Once you’re ready to submit your assignment, move on to Step 2.Assessment Description In Topic 3, you read

Do you need academic writing help with your homework? Let us write your papers.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Take a moment to review the details of this assignment below and gather any necessary files. Once you’re ready to submit your assignment, move on to Step 2.Assessment Description

In Topic 3, you read three articles about the skills of the researcher. In this assignment, you will identify three themes common to the articles and write a synthesis paper about research skills using evidence from the articles to support your themes. Use the skills you developed in RES-815 while completing the Emerging Writer Worksheet in which you identified themes, supported them with evidence from the articles, built a thesis claim, and outlined your paper.

General Requirements:Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now
  • Review the articles by Lindsay (2015); Lee, Chang, and Bryan (2020); and Klocko, Marshal, and Davidson (2015) located in the topic Resources.
  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • Refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association for specific guidelines related to doctoral-level writing. The manual contains essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Directions:

Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that synthesizes the Lindsay (2015); Lee, Chang, and Bryan (2020); and Klocko, Marshal, and Davidson (2015) articles. Your paper should include the following:

  1. An introduction that introduces and provides context for the topic. This includes presenting a clear thesis statement.
  2. Identification of and support for three themes with evidence from each article. Synthesize your discussion of the topic to support your thesis.
  3. A conclusion that demonstrates support of your thesis statement, briefly summarizes the main points from your three themes, and makes recommendations for future research on the topic

Take a moment to review the details of this assignment below and gather any necessary files. Once you’re ready to submit your assignment, move on to Step 2.Assessment Description In Topic 3, you read
Rubric Introduction 33 points Criteria Description Introduction 5. 5: Excellent 33 points An introduction is thoroughly presented and vividly contextualizes the topic. 4. 4: Good 30.03 points An introduction is present and adequately contextualizes the topic. 3. 3: Satisfactory 27.06 points An introduction is presented, but does not contextualize the topic well. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 24.09 points An introduction is present, but incomplete or illogical. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points An introduction is either missing or not evident to the reader. Support of Common Themes 44 points Criteria Description Support of Common Themes 5. 5: Excellent 44 points Support of common themes is thoroughly presented with rich detail. 4. 4: Good 40.04 points Support of common themes is present and thorough. 3. 3: Satisfactory 36.08 points Support of common themes is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 32.12 points Support of common themes is present, but inaccurate or illogical. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Support of common themes is either missing or not evident to the reader. Discussion of Conclusions 33 points Criteria Description Discussion of Conclusions 5. 5: Excellent 33 points A discussion of the conclusions is thoroughly presented including an overall summary of themes found in the articles and is strongly connected to the thesis statement. 4. 4: Good 30.03 points A discussion of the conclusions is presented and includes an overall summary of themes found in the articles and reasonably connects to the thesis statement. 3. 3: Satisfactory 27.06 points A discussion of the conclusions is presented, but it does not include an overall summary of themes found in the articles or does not connect well to the thesis statement. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 24.09 points A discussion of the conclusions is presented, but inaccurate or illogical. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points A discussion of the conclusions is not presented. Synthesis and Argument 66 points Criteria Description Synthesis and Argument 5. 5: Excellent 66 points Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing, presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 4. 4: Good 60.06 points Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. 3. 3: Satisfactory 54.12 points Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 48.18 points Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources. Thesis Development and Purpose 22 points Mechanics of Writing 11 points Criteria Description Mechanics of Writing 5. 5: Excellent 11 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 4. 4: Good 10.01 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. 3. 3: Satisfactory 9.02 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 8.03 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. APA Format 11 points Criteria Description APA Format 5. 5: Excellent 11 points The document is correctly formatted. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. 4. 4: Good 10.01 points Required format is used, but minor errors are present (e.g. headings and direct quotes). Reference page is present and includes all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. 3. 3: Satisfactory 9.02 points Required format is generally correct. However, errors are present (e.g. font, cover page, margins, and in-text citations). Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented though some errors are present. 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 8.03 points Required format elements are missing or incorrect. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. However, in-text citations are inconsistently used. 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points Required format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No in-text citations are used.
Take a moment to review the details of this assignment below and gather any necessary files. Once you’re ready to submit your assignment, move on to Step 2.Assessment Description In Topic 3, you read
What Works for Doctoral Students in Completing Their Thesis? Read: Lindsay, S. (2015). What works for doctoral students in completing their thesis? Teaching in Higher Education, 20(2). 183-196. http://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.974025 Doctoral Students’ Learning Success in Online-Based Leadership Programs: Intersection With Technological and Relational Factors Read: Lee, H., Chang, H., & Bryan, L. (2020). Doctoral students’ learning success in online-based leadership programs: Intersection with technological and relational factors. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 61-81. http://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4462 Developing Practioner-Scholar Doctoral Candidates as Critical Writers Read: Klocko, B. A., Marshal, S. M., & Davidson, J. F. (2015). Developing practioner-scholar doctoral candidates as critical writers. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 15(4). 21-31. http://www.na-businesspress.com/JHETP/KlockoBA_Web15_4_.pdf

Our team of vetted writers in every subject is waiting to help you pass that class. With keen editors and a friendly customer support team, we guarantee custom-written, original, high-quality papers. Get top grades.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper