My topic is: GMOs on food security in India (food security and food sovereignty)

I already finish the introduction paragraph, so please write the last 4 pages. Total at least 1500 words. 3 citation, at least 2 must from academic resources.

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A SUCCESSFUL ESSAY:

• It should include a heading, title, and be reasonably proofread.
• It must define a clear food justice problem based on the 3 criteria listed above.
• It must define that problem in no less than 1500 words. !!!!
• It must clearly address all four questions listed above.
• It must use at least three outside sources found through your own, independent research to define that problem, and of those sources:
  • At least two must be scholarly sources
  • The remaining source(s) can be either conventional or scholarly.
  • It cannot directly use any tertiary sources (usually sources like encyclopedias, like Wikipedia)
• It should use MLA style for in-text citations and include an MLA Works Cited Page at the end of the essay.
• It should feature minimal direct quoting, and only use short direct quotes when necessary/useful (so, no block quotes).*

*(A literature review is about summarizing the research you’ve conducted in your own words, so it does not require, and should not feature, extensive direct quoting)

THE ESSAY ITSELF SHOULD THOROUGHLY ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:

1. WHAT IS THE PROBLEM AND WHY DOES IT MATTER, IN YOUR OPINION?
   • QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER ANSWERING HERE: WHO IS THIS PROBLEM AFFECTING? WHO IS LIKELY TO CARE ABOUT THIS PROBLEM? WHY IS IT AN UNRESOLVED ISSUE? WHAT SEEM TO BE THE CAUSES OF THE PROBLEM? WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE PROBLEM? WHAT’S IMPORTANT OR SIGNIFICANT ABOUT THIS PROBLEM TO YOU?
2. WHAT DOES THE CURRENT LITERATURE HAVE TO SAY ABOUT YOUR PROBLEM’S HISTORY, CURRENT STATUS, AND OUTLOOK?
   • (SEE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE NUMBER OF SOURCES): HERE, DECIDE ON A CLEAR ORGANIZING STRATEGY FOR YOUR SUMMARY OF THE RESEARCH. AGAIN, THE UNC WRITING CENTER (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE. HAS MORE DETAIL, BUT COMMON AND EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES ARE:
     • CHRONOLOGICAL (BY PUBLICATION DATE)
     • BY MAIN THEMES
     • BY RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
     • CONVENTIONAL SOURCES VS. SCHOLARLY SOURCES
3. HOW WOULD YOU EVALUATE THE RELATIVE SIGNIFICANCE OR IMPACT OF YOUR SOURCES TO YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE FOOD JUSTICE PROBLEM?
   • QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER ANSWERING HERE: WHICH ESSAYS/SOURCES WERE MORE ENGAGING AND PERSUASIVE? WHY? DID ANY SOURCES SEEM MORE THOROUGH OR WELL-RESEARCHED THAN THE OTHERS? DID ONE OR MORE SOURCES FRUSTRATE, CONFUSE, OR DISAPPOINT YOU? WHY? IF YOU HAD TO TEACH A UNIT ON YOUR FOOD JUSTICE PROBLEM, WHICH SOURCES WOULD YOU HAVE YOUR STUDENTS’ READ, AND WHY?
4. WHAT QUESTIONS, CONCERNS, OR AREAS IN NEED OF MORE RESEARCH STILL REMAIN FOR YOU AT THIS STAGE IN THE RESEARCH PROCESS ON YOUR FOOD JUSTICE PROBLEM?