no plagiarism no high turn-in and please go by the guidelines step by step I’m getting minus for that.
HCM 415 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric Continue analyzing the situation your case study’s healthcare organization faces. In this milestone, you will continue to evaluate the impact of the mission and vision of the healthcare organization’s strategic plan. You will also consider how the organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats effect the environmental factors that confront the healthcare organization. You will develop a 2 –4-page SWOT a nalysis of the healthcare organiza tion . Be sure to address the following: A. Briefly summarize your case study. B. To what extent do the organization’s policies address this issue? Be sure to justify your response. C. To what extent does the organization’s strategic planning around this issue ali gn with its organizational mission and vision ? Use evidence and examples to justify your reasoning. D. What do you feel are the organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats ( SWOT ) with regard to this issue? Be sure to substantiate your claims with evidence and specific examples. E. Based on the SWOT analysis you performed, what environmental factors are at play in terms of this issue and what is their impact on the delivery of care within the organization? In other words, identify any new policies or new trends that will affect your day -to-day operation. Guidelines for Submission : This short paper should be between 2 and 4 pages, not including cover page and references. This paper should be in APA format. Critical Element Exemplary (100%) Proficient( 90 %) Needs Improvement ( 75 %) Not Evident (0%) Value Overview Meets “Proficient” criteria and expertly balances brevity with required detail Provides a brief summary of the selected case study Provides a summary of the selected case study, but response is verbose or has gaps in required detail Does not provide a summary of the selected case study 5 Analysis: Policies Meets “Proficient” criteria and makes nuanced inferences about the efficacy of organizational policies or strategic planning in addressing issues Logically assesses how effectively organizational policies or strategic planning address the issue, justifying response Assesses how effectively organizational policies or strategic planning address the issue, justifying response, but with gaps in logic, detail, or justification Does not assess how effectively organizational policies or strategic planning address the issue 20 Analysis: Mission and Vision Meets “Proficient” criteria and draws nuanced connections between organizational strategic planning and organizational mission and vision Logically assesses the extent to which strategic planning around issue aligns with mission and vision, justifying reasoning with evidence and examples Assesses the extent to which strategic planning around issue aligns with mission and vision, justifying reasoning with evidence and examples, but response is cursory or illogical or has gaps in justification Does not assess the extent to which strategic planning around issue aligns with mission and vision 20 Analysis: SWOT Meets “Proficient” cri teria and demonstrates exceptional insight into organizational strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats Logically assesses organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats with regard to issue, substantiating claims with evidence and specific examples Assesses organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats with regard to issue, substantiating claims with evidence and examples, but with gaps in logic, detail, substantiation, or specificity of examples Does not asse ss organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats with regard to issue 25 Analysis: Environmental Factors Meets “Proficient” criteria and draws nuanced connections between environmental factors and delivery of care Accurately identifies environmental factors contributing to issue and determines their impact on delivery of care based on SWOT analysis Identifies environmental factors contributing to issue and determines their impact on delivery of care based on SWOT analysis, but response has gaps in accuracy or detail Does not identify environmental factors contributing to issue and does not determine their impact on delivery of care based on SWOT analysis 25 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is prese nted in a professional and easy -to- read format Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar , spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 5 Total 100%