in the study i stated that i would distribute a survey i need a survey completed for me to give to the subjects i also need a questionnaire to screen the person trying to find out if they re eligible to take my survey 2 hours ago done seen 1 hour a

/in /by

in the study I stated that I would distribute a survey. I need a survey completed for me to give to the subjects.

I also need a questionnaire to screen the person trying to find out if they’re eligible to take my survey.

2 hours ago

seen

that’s as much detail as I can give.

CJ Questions

/in /by

Answer these throughly.  CXite sources.  I can give copies of chapters covered as well.

ghostwriting discuss andrew o hagan describing assange in his essay amp quot ghosting amp quot and o hagan writing as assange in his autobiography

/in /by

No plagarism

I have attached the instructions and the autobiography.

Here is a link to the essay “Ghosting” by Andrew O’Hagan.

biostatistical methods

/in /by

Parametric vs. Nonparametric Methods

The purpose of this assignment is to differentiate between parametric and nonparametric statistical methods. In addition, this assignment will help you understand and implement parametric or nonparametric statistical methods.

Research the following statistical topics:

  • Levels of measurement
  • Parametric and nonparametric methods

On the basis of your research and understanding, respond to the following:

  • Find and state the definition of levels of measurement that distinguishes the five types of data used in statistical analysis.
  • In your own words, compare the five types of data and explain how they differ.
  • Find and state a definition of parametric and nonparametric methods that distinguishes between the two.
  • In your own words, explain the difference between parametric and nonparametric methods.
  • Explain which types of data require parametric statistics to be used and which types of data require nonparametric statistics to be used and why.
  • Compare the advantages and disadvantages of using parametric and nonparametric statistics.
  • Describe how the level of measurement helps determine which of these methods to use on the data being analyzed.

03 please check question below 2

/in /by

Discuss in 500 words or more the top 5 details that should be included in your cloud SLA.

module 05 written assignment sentiment analysis and process

/in /by

Write a 1-2 page, APA formatted paper with citations and references, analyzing sentiment analysis. Within your paper, discuss what sentiment analysis is used for and provide examples of popular application. List the steps in the sentiment analysis process and briefly compare the two methods for polarity identification.

theory in every day culture

/in /by

Theory in every day culture

Classical Music for Brain Power – Mozart

1. Provide a 1 page single space summary of the relationship of this song to the Empowerment theory.

2. Discuss how the song relates to or exemplifies the Empowerment theory

3. Provide the web-link/lyrics/words in this paper

exam political theory

/in /by

Please select one of the following two essay questions for your final examination. This is a take home exam. Essays should not exceed 5 double spaced pages in length. All exams must be uploaded to Canvas by 4:00 pm on Wednesday . Your essay is worth 40 points toward your final grade.

1.It’s the last day of final exams at UAB. You are looking for a table at the University Commons so you can begin your essay for Foundations of Political Theory. The only seat is at a table with already occupied by Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Edmund Burke, Mary Wollstonecraft, Karl Marx and Martin Luther King. They welcome you to sit with them and join the conversation about men, women, and revolution. What questions do you want to ask these authors? How have their ideas informed your own understanding of politics? Create a dialogue about property and liberty, difference and democracy, and the nature of justice.

2.Marx, Mill, and King focus attention on the economic, political, and racial injustice. Analyze how each author’s arguments relate to extending civil rights in a democracy by highlighting how divisions of class, ideology, and race prevent full participation in a just and representative democracy.

3. Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. drew on his readings in political theory as he constructed the Letter from the Birmingham Jail addressing racial injustice in our city and nation. Write your own letter from a Birmingham classroom analyzing your lived experience through the works of Rousseau, Burke, Wollstonecraft, Marx, Mill, and King. (Keep in mind that you can also reference and respond to earlier writings we have studied throughout the semester). This is your letter — let’s hear your voice as you join the conversation on justice and democracy in political thought.

you are a nurse leader who serves on an ethics committee in your healthcare organization you are tasked with writing an informative scholarly professional position paper about ethical challenges in nursing practice and procedural alignment with the org 1

/in /by

Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. Use the report provided when submitting your task as a guide.


Professional Communications is a required aspect to pass this task. Completion of a spell check and grammar check prior to submitting your final work is strongly recommended.


You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

Develop an informative, scholarly, professional position paper for the ethics committee by doing the following:

A. Discuss two ethical challenges in nursing practice that are common to your organization, as well as the ethical principles involved in the American Nursing Association (ANA) Code of Ethics.

1. For each ethical challenge, describe one potential legal implication.

2. Support your discussion with a minimum of two scholarly sources, published within the past five years, for each challenge. A minimum of one source of the two must be a course text or course resource.

B. Discuss the responsibility of a nurse with a master’s degree acting in a leadership role within the organization by doing the following:

1. Describe the role of the nurse leader in applying a published, ethical decision-making model to one of the ethical challenges in part A.

2. Discuss the actual or potential stakeholders involved in and affected by the outcome of the ethical decision-making process and the potential impact on each stakeholder.

3. Describe the role of interdisciplinary team members throughout the ethical decision-making process.

4. Describe a transformational leadership strategy that the nurse leader might use to promote interdisciplinary team collaboration during the ethical decision-making process.

C. Explain how the actions taken in part B align with your organization’s mission statement.

D. Submit your position paper in APA style and format, including but not limited to the title page and headers, in-text citations, and references.

E. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

File Restrictions

File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z

RUBRIC


A
:
ETHICAL CHALLENGES

NOT EVIDENT

A discussion of 2 ethical challenges in nursing practice and the ethical principles involved is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion identifies 2 ethical challenges common to the organization, but it does not accurately discuss the applicable ethical principles or provisions of the American Nursing Association (ANA) Code of ethics for each ethical challenge.

COMPETENT

The discussion identifies 2 ethical challenges that are common to the organization and accurately discusses the applicable ethical principles or provisions of the American Nursing Association (ANA) Code of Ethics for each ethical challenge.

A1:LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

NOT EVIDENT

A description of 1 potential legal implication for each ethical challenge identified in part A is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion demonstrates limited understanding of legal implications by inaccurately describing 1 potential legal implication that could result from each ethical challenge discussed in part A.

COMPETENT

The discussion demonstrates understanding of legal implications by accurately describing 1 potential legal implication that could result from each ethical challenge discussed in part A.

A2:SOURCES

NOT EVIDENT

The discussion is not supported by any scholarly sources.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion is supported by only 1 scholarly source for each challenge. Or at least 1 of the scholarly sources was not published in the last five years. Or at least 1 of the citations is not a course text or resource.

COMPETENT

The discussion is supported by at least 2 scholarly sources published within the past five years for each challenge. At least 1 of the sources is a course text or resource.

B1:ROLE OF THE NURSE

NOT EVIDENT

A description of the role of the nurse in a leadership role applying an ethical decision-making model to 1 of the ethical challenges in part A is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The description demonstrates limited understanding of the role of a nurse in a leadership role by inaccurately identifying a published ethical decision-making model or illogically applying the steps of the ethical decision-making model to 1 of the ethical challenges discussed in part A.

COMPETENT

The description demonstrates understanding of the role of a nurse in a leadership role by accurately identifying a published ethical decision-making model and logically applying the steps of that ethical decision-making model to 1 of the ethical challenges discussed in part A.

B2:STAKEHOLDERS

NOT EVIDENT

A discussion of the actual or potential stakeholders involved in the ethical decision-making model and the potential impact of the outcome on each stakeholder is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion inaccurately identifies actual or potential stakeholders involved and affected or does not logically describe the potential impact of the outcome of the ethical decision-making process on each stakeholder.

COMPETENT

The discussion accurately identifies the actual or potential stakeholders involved and affected and logically describes the potential impact of the outcome of the ethical decision-making process on each stakeholder.

B3:ROLE OF TEAM MEMBERS

NOT EVIDENT

A description of the role of interdisciplinary team members throughout the ethical decision-making process is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The description demonstrates limited understanding of the role of the interdisciplinary team by not appropriately identifying potential team members or by not logically describing the role each team member will play throughout the ethical decision-making process.

COMPETENT

The description demonstrates understanding of the role of the interdisciplinary team by appropriately identifying potential team members and by logically describing the role each team member will play throughout the ethical decision-making process.

B4:LEADERSHIP STRATEGY

NOT EVIDENT

A description of a transformational leadership strategy used to promote team collaboration during the ethical decision-making process is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The description demonstrates limited understanding of a transformational leadership strategy by not identifying or defining the strategy or by not describing how the strategy could be applied to facilitate team collaboration during the ethical decision-making process.

COMPETENT

The description demonstrates understanding of a transformational leadership strategy by identifying and defining the strategy and describing how it can be applied to facilitate team collaboration during the ethical decision-making process.

C:ALIGNMENT

NOT EVIDENT

An explanation of how the actions taken in part B align with the organization’s mission statement is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The explanation demonstrates limited understanding of alignment to the organization’s mission statement by not providing the mission statement or by not explaining how the specific actions taken in part B will align to the actual mission statement.

COMPETENT

The explanation demonstrates understanding of alignment to the organization’s mission statement by providing the mission statement and by logically explaining how the specific actions taken in part B align to the actual mission statement.

D:APA STYLE AND FORMAT

NOT EVIDENT

The submission does not include in-text citations and references according to APA style for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized, but it does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style and format.

COMPETENT

The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style and format.

E:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION

NOT EVIDENT

Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.

COMPETENT

Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.

discussion board responce 11

/in /by

*Please write a response of 100 – 150 word count with one scholar reference using apa format in text citation.

Jaime

The school administrator who received the calls in this situation was correct in meeting with the parents and students who raised the concerns. However, once the investigation was complete no further action against the teacher should have been taken. The teacher was not found in any violation of policies and no harm was caused to the student. The calls were mainly regarding individual preferences and with them not agreeing to her lifestyle. It had nothing to do with her ability to perform her job as a teacher or coach. The Supreme Court recognized that an “irrational prejudice” cannot provide a rational basis to support a state action against an equal protection challenge (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2015, p. 483).

The Spanish Fork High School was wrong in ignoring the teacher’s explementary teaching and coaching record. Ms. Weaver was considered an effective and capable teacher, her evaluations ranged from good to excellent, and she never had any disciplinary actions (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2015, p. 482). She looked out for the best interest of the students and was treated unfairly due to her sexual orientation. The equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment, which says, “no state shall … deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws” (Equal Protection Clause, 2013). All aspects of her career should have been taken into consideration and the positive impact she had on the students. Decisions should not have been based on other biases.

The teacher did not instigate the student to ask her about her sexual orientation. She answered honestly without giving in-depth details about her lifestyle. You need the First Amendment precisely when your ideas offend others or flout the majority’s orthodoxies. And then it protects more than your freedom to speak your mind; it guards your freedom not to speak the mind of another (George & Girgis, 2017). Although as Christian business leaders we may not agree with a person’s lifestyle, we need to judge them on their performance. 1 Corinthians 6:12 states, “I have the right to do anything,” you say—but not everything is beneficial. “I have the right to do anything”—but I will not be mastered by anything” (New International Version). It’s important not to make decisions based on our own convictions. Everyone deserves the right to be treated equally and free from biased decisions.