Read/review the following resources for this activity:
- Minimum of 1 scholarly source
Introduction
You began this session considering a moral-ethical dilemma you yourself faced that you either resolved or failed to resolve, but hopefully learned from. You may never have given much thought to ethical theory nor what ethical premises/paradigms you have unconsciously held.
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper Now
Instructions
Now that you have had an opportunity to explore ethics formally, create a reflective assessment of your learning experience and the collaborations you engaged in throughout this session. You will submit both of the following:
- A written reflection
- An oral presentation using VoiceThread or a PowerPoint narrated slide show. If you choose to do a VoiceThread, be sure to submit the link to the VoiceThread and make it so the instructor is authorized to view it. If you need help in doing so, please call the Chamberlain help desk for aid.
For the written reflection, revisit your ethical memoir and address the following:
- What ethical theory best applies to your experience? The good and the evil
- Which significant author you have studied most speaks to your own ethical paradigm as you are (re)forming it now?
- If you did not resolve your ethical dilemma when you experienced it, what would you do now and why?
For the oral presentation, briefly summarize your memoire and explore your process of transformation in this course.
- Discuss your experiences of the course, your beginnings and where you are now. Consider your interaction in discussions and groups.
- Are we a society of learners who greatly benefit from interactions?
- Or are we islands, whose individual systems and beliefs are exclusive to ourselves?
Writing Requirements (APA format)
- Length: 2 pages (not including title page or references page)
- 1-inch margins
- Double spaced
- 12-point Times New Roman font
- Title page
- References page (minimum of 1 scholarly source)
Presentation Requirements
Grading
This activity will be graded based on the Ethical Reflection Grading Rubric.
Weekly Objectives (WO)
WO2, 2.6, 7.2
Rubric
Ethical Reflection Grading Rubric – 75 pts
Ethical Reflection Grading Rubric – 75 pts
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength
|
| 5.0 pts
Outstanding
Meets length requirement
|
0.0 pts
No Effort
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
|
| 10.0 pts
Outstanding
Addresses all aspects of the assignment.
|
8.5 pts
Above Average
Addresses most aspects of the assignment.
|
7.5 pts
Average
Addresses some aspects of the assignment.
|
6.0 pts
Below Average
Addresses few aspects of the assignment.
|
0.0pts
No Effort
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
|
| 15.0 pts
Outstanding
Throughout the whole work, the writing shows depth of critical thought; leverages readings and course materials in support of writer’s evident effort to understand ethical problems; establishes good use of theoretical underpinnings.
|
12.75 pts
Above Average
Throughout most of the work, the writing shows depth of critical thought; leverages readings and course materials in support of writer’s evident effort to understand ethical problems; establishes good use of theoretical underpinnings.
|
11.25 pts
Average
Throughout some of the work, the writing shows depth of critical thought; leverages readings and course materials in support of writer’s evident effort to understand ethical problems; establishes good use of theoretical underpinnings.
|
6.0 pts
Below Average
Throughout little of the work, the writing shows depth of critical thought; leverages readings and course materials in support of writer’s evident effort to understand ethical problems; establishes good use of theoretical underpinnings.
|
0.0pts
No Effort
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection
|
| 15.0 pts
Outstanding
Clearly articulates several connections between the course concepts and life experiences and conducts insightful examination of course experience with several clear examples and support.
|
12.75 pts
Above Average
Articulates some connections between the course concepts and life and conducts some examination of the course experience with several clear examples and support.
|
11.25 pts
Average
Articulates some connections between the course concepts and life experiences and conducts some examination of the course experience but examination could be refined and more in depth.
|
6.0 pts
Below Average
Presents unclear connection between the course concepts and life experiences and conducts little examination of the course experience.
|
0.0pts
No Effort
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Concepts
|
| 10.0 pts
Outstanding
Ideas are logically organized, including inviting introduction (with a thesis statement) and a satisfactory conclusion, that come together in complete concepts.
|
8.5 pts
Above Average
Ideas are well organized, including inviting introduction (with a thesis statement) and a satisfactory conclusion, with complete concepts.
|
7.5 pts
Average
Organization and concepts need some restructuring.
|
6.0 pts
Below Average
Organization and concepts are difficult to follow and incomplete.
|
0.0pts
No Effort
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting / Presentation
|
| 10.0 pts
Outstanding
Throughout the whole work, the writing/presentation actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety; has a professional and consistent format and articulates clearly (presentation).
|
8.5 pts
Above Average
Throughout most of the work, the writing/presentation actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety; has a professional and consistent format and articulates clearly (presentation).
|
7.5 pts
Average
Throughout some of the work, the writing/presentation actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety; has a professional and consistent format and articulates clearly (presentation).
|
6.0 pts
Below Average
Throughout little of the work, the writing/presentation actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety; has a professional and consistent format and articulates clearly (presentation).
|
0.0pts
No Effort
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA: Citation and Reference Formatting
|
| 10.0 pts
Outstanding
Throughout the whole work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; references page/slide includes complete bibliographic information for sources using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA style (paper).
|
8.5 pts
Above Average
Throughout most of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; references page/slide includes complete bibliographic information for sources using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA style (paper).
|
7.5 pts
Average
Throughout some of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; references page/slide includes complete bibliographic information for sources using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA style (paper).
|
6.0 pts
Below Average
Throughout little of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; references page/slide includes complete bibliographic information for sources using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA style (paper).
|
0.0pts
No Effort
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 75.0
|
